Statistical discrepancy in calculating the validity of a number of physical tests for students of the Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences in the College of Basic Education

Abstract

Current research aims to identify:Degree of correlative validity of a battery of short physical tests (anaerobic tests) for a sample of students in physical education and sports departments.The degree of validity of hypothetical (discriminatory) formation of a battery of short physical (anaerobic) tests on a sample of PE and Sports Science stu-dents. and statistical differences between the degree of honesty by the method of relative honesty and the validity of the hypothetical (discriminatory) for-mation of a series of short physical examinations on a sample of students in physical education and sports science departments.The study sample included (60) students from the research community after excluding female students (because the study idea was restricted to male stu-dents only) and after excluding exploratory experimental samples and stabil-ity It was ) students, because (60) students were selected by systematic ran-domization to represent the main research sample and the test was applied to them.Students representing the current research sample. Whitney will calcu-late the difference. The researchers concluded that there was excellent value for the correlation validity of the six tests used in the study of the study sam-ple, and excellent value for the hypothesis construction validity of the six tests used in the study. rice field. research sample. .The researchers recommend that when extracting the efficacy of a physical test similar to the current test, the method of comparison between opposite groups (different levels) should use correlative efficacy. This is because it is more accurate and yields better results when calculated. Both methods can be used and reused in other studies in calculating the validity of the tests used in the current study. I can do it. Because it yields the same results and shows the choices we have in measuring what is set