Self-Efficacy Among Fencing Coaches in Sports Clubs in Baghdad Governorate

Main Article Content

حسام عباس ياس

Abstract

This study aims to assess the level of self-efficacy among fencing coaches in Baghdad sports clubs by constructing a scientifically validated scale tailored to the psychological and professional dimensions of sports coaching. The researcher employed a descriptive correlational method and applied the scale to a sample of 30 coaches from five clubs: Police, Army, Electricity, Communications, and Dijla University. The final scale consisted of 21 items across three domains: training planning, situation management, and psychological interaction. Results revealed that all coaches exhibited a self-efficacy level above the hypothetical mean, with statistically significant differences attributed to club type and organizational environment. The researcher recommends implementing professional development programs to enhance self-efficacy and adopting the scale as an evaluation tool within sports institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
حسام عباس ياس. (2026). Self-Efficacy Among Fencing Coaches in Sports Clubs in Baghdad Governorate. Mustansiriyah Journal of Sports Science, 8(3), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.62540/mjss.2026.3.8.18
Section
Articles

References

المراجع العربية

• البياتي، ك. ف. (2021). أثر البيئة التنظيمية في تعزيز الكفاءة المهنية. مجلة المستنصرية للعلوم الرياضية، 22(2)، 112130–

• جاسم، ن. م. (2020). الخصائص القيادية وعلاقتها بالكفاية النفسية. مجلة التربية البدنية وعلوم الرياضة – المستنصرية، 16(3)، 4159–

• عبد الله، ع. ج. (2021). الكفايات النفسية والإدارية للمدربين العراقيين. مجلة المستنصرية للتربية البدنية، 19(2)، 98115–

• ماهر، م. ع. (2022). الكفاية الذاتية وعلاقتها بالثقة النفسية لدى المدربين. مجلة المستنصرية للإدارة الرياضية، 20(1)، 6584–

المراجع الأجنبية

• Albert Bandura (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

• Albert Bandura (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38, 44–49.

• Gibbs, N. P., Bartlett, T., & Schugurensky, D. (2021). Does school participatory budgeting increase students’ political efficacy? Bandura’s “sources,” civic pedagogy, and education for democracy. Curriculum and Teaching.

• Maher, M. (2022). Psychological competence in sport coaching. Journal of Sport Science, 18(1), 44–61.

• Ouyang, R., Long, Y., Zhang, J., & Cao, Z. (2023). Interventions for improving self-efficacy in patients after stroke based on Bandura’s cognition theory: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 30, 820–832.

• Poluektova, O., Kappas, A., & Smith, C. A. (2023). Using Bandura's self-efficacy theory to explain individual differences in the appraisal of problem-focused coping potential. Emotion Review, 15, 302–312.

• Rahayuningtyas, W., Wulandari, R. T., Pramono, A., Prasetyo, M., & Maretta, S. E. (2020). The effectiveness of self-efficacy “Bandura” learning model in digital-based Topeng Malang teaching. KnE Social Sciences.

• Stephen P. Robbins (2020). Organizational behavior. Pearson Education.

• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.